If atheism is a religion then bald is a hair color.


I’ve never understood why that’s not understood. Now, why do we asume lack of property for proof of existence? I mean, suppose cdm isn’t made of wimps, we don’t have enough machos to make it work, and somehow everything else comes up short – what’s that mean? Is our tent stolen, Watson?

I’d rather say we’ll find proof of supersymmetric theory when we try again, but is it just hope? Everything we’ve done so far is test and exclude. We have property – gravity, mass. We have something else – dark energy, a seeming impossibility (uniformity, constant density). What if one of them is a property of the other?



Well? Post a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s